The Lincoln Plawg - the blog with footnotes

Politics and law from a British perspective (hence Politics LAW BloG): ''People who like this sort of thing...'' as the Great Man said

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Wednesday, March 10, 2004


(Not quite in the Hix Nix Stix Pix class, but, hey!)

The Susan Moeller study that I mentioned yesterday is still on my To Read list.

Meanwhile, William Jackson in E&P today weighs in with criticism of the New York Times on its handling of the matter - not, I think, singling out the Times as particularly bad, but rather using it as an example of general practice.

He kicks off with the Chalabi WMD intel kiss-off - my piece of February 21, suggesting NIH or embarrassment over past Chalabi-rimming as a reason. He loses points for not pointing out that the hack concerned was Con Coughlin who, a cursory search here will reveal, has a significant record of journalistic shortcoming.

He also cites the March 6 piece by Douglas Jehl on how USG pre-war ignored intelligence suggesting Saddam had no WMD left as failing to recognise the beam in the Gray Lady's eye (quote is from Jehl):
"...The agencies and the administration cited only reports from informants who supported the view that Iraq possessed so-called weapons of mass destruction." In essence, was this not a frequent practice at the Times?

Ombud Daniel Okrent's statute of limitations against matters which arose before his arrival is rather unhelpful on the issue...

free website counter Weblog Commenting and Trackback by